RST, a leading producer of Endosulfan in the Kasargod area, used aerial spraying to enhance efficiency in cashew plantations where the pesticide was applied. Environmental NGOs conducted studies indicating that aerial spraying had severe health impacts on local residents. As a result, the High Court banned the use of Endosulfan in Kasargod’s cashew plantations and ordered RST to dispose of their Endosulfan stocks in an environmentally friendly manner.
Summary
**Q7. RST, a leading producer of Endosulfan in the Kasargod area, used aerial spraying to enhance efficiency in cashew plantations where the pesticide was applied. Environmental NGOs conducted studies indicating that aerial spraying had severe health impacts on local residents. As a result, the High Court banned the use of Endosulfan in Kasargod’s cashew plantations and ordered RST to dispose of their Endosulfan stocks in an environmentally friendly manner.** **Several years later, a new issue
Exam Brief
GS-3A High Court banned Endosulfan use in Kasargod due to health impacts from aerial spraying. This highlights environmental regulation, corporate responsibility, and public health issues relevant to UPSC.
Key Facts
- Endosulfan was used in Kasargod cashew plantations.
- Aerial spraying was used to apply the pesticide.
- The High Court banned Endosulfan due to health impacts.
- RST was ordered to dispose of Endosulfan stocks properly.
Prelims — What UPSC Might Ask
- What are the known health impacts of Endosulfan?
This article hasn't been rewritten for exam prep yet. Showing original content.
Source Article Content
Q7. RST, a leading producer of Endosulfan in the Kasargod area, used aerial spraying to enhance efficiency in cashew plantations where the pesticide was applied. Environmental NGOs conducted studies indicating that aerial spraying had severe health impacts on local residents. As a result, the High Court banned the use of Endosulfan in Kasargod’s cashew plantations and ordered RST to dispose of their Endosulfan stocks in an environmentally friendly manner.
Several years later, a new issue emerged as activists claimed that RST had disposed of Endosulfan into nearby wells, leading to groundwater pollution in the region. This action was seen as a violation of the court’s orders, sparking intense local protests. As a Special Investigating Officer appointed by the government, you are tasked with investigating and taking appropriate action on this matter.
In this context, answer the following:
• Mention the stakeholders and ethical issues surrounding the case. **Identify the reasons behind such irresponsible conduct by the firm. ** Suggest some measures to tackle the aforementioned problems. [20 M] • Mention the stakeholders and ethical issues surrounding the case. • **Identify the reasons behind such irresponsible conduct by the firm. ** • Suggest some measures to tackle the aforementioned problems. [20 M] Difficulty Level: Medium
Why the question: The case highlights the ethical and environmental challenges arising from corporate negligence in hazardous waste disposal, emphasizing the need for regulatory enforcement, corporate responsibility, and environmental sustainability. Key demand of the question: The question requires identification of stakeholders and ethical issues involved, an analysis of the reasons behind corporate irresponsibility, and recommendations for addressing the problem effectively. Structure of the Answer: Introduction: Introduce the significance of environmental ethics in corporate practices and the consequences of neglecting ecological responsibilities, referencing the case context. Body: Stakeholders and ethical issues: Discuss the key parties affected, including local communities, regulatory bodies, and the company, while highlighting ethical concerns like public health, corporate responsibility, and legal compliance. Reasons for irresponsible conduct: Analyze factors such as cost-cutting motives, regulatory gaps, lack of environmental awareness, and weak ethical governance within the organization. Measures to tackle the problems: Suggest regulatory strengthening, corporate responsibility initiatives, community engagement, and adoption of advanced disposal technologies to ensure ethical compliance. Conclusion: Emphasize the need for a holistic approach that balances industrial growth with environmental stewardship to safeguard public health and ecological integrity. Why the question: The case highlights the ethical and environmental challenges arising from corporate negligence in hazardous waste disposal, emphasizing the need for regulatory enforcement, corporate responsibility, and environmental sustainability.
Key demand of the question: The question requires identification of stakeholders and ethical issues involved, an analysis of the reasons behind corporate irresponsibility, and recommendations for addressing the problem effectively.
Structure of the Answer:
Introduction: Introduce the significance of environmental ethics in corporate practices and the consequences of neglecting ecological responsibilities, referencing the case context.
• Stakeholders and ethical issues: Discuss the key parties affected, including local communities, regulatory bodies, and the company, while highlighting ethical concerns like public health, corporate responsibility, and legal compliance. • Reasons for irresponsible conduct: Analyze factors such as cost-cutting motives, regulatory gaps, lack of environmental awareness, and weak ethical governance within the organization. • Measures to tackle the problems: Suggest regulatory strengthening, corporate responsibility initiatives, community engagement, and adoption of advanced disposal technologies to ensure ethical compliance. Conclusion: Emphasize the need for a holistic approach that balances industrial growth with environmental stewardship to safeguard public health and ecological integrity.